U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution
Project Case Summary
Sierra National Forest Dinkey Project Planning Forum
March 2009 - September 2009
Location: Clovis, California
National Forests in the Sierra Nevadas face continuing controversies over the effects of timber harvest on old-growth forests and their wildlife,
such as the California spotted owl and the Pacific fisher. To determine whether forested ecosystems can be managed to maintain essential components
and still support a variety of uses, the Sierra National Forest teamed up with the Pacific Southwest Research Station in a proposed adaptive management
study, The Kings River Project. Since the project was initially proposed, it has faced numerous administrative and legal challenges from conservation
groups, which have raised concerns regarding the project's scale and reach, and its potential impacts on sensitive wildlife species.
With the help of the U.S. Institute, the Dinkey Project Planning Forum convened to develop a project in the Dinkey North and South areas of the
Sierra National Forest as a sub-set of the Kings River Project. The planning forum included representatives from all stakeholder interests, including
forest industry, conservation, wildlife, fire safety, and adjacent landowners. The forum's overall goal was to design and implement vegetative
treatments to restore a healthy forest structure and reduce fire-risk, while supporting ecosystem functions and addressing stakeholder interests.
Results and Accomplishments
- Through joint fact finding, parties were able to agree on fundamental science issues, providing a sound framework for decision making.
- The forum reached agreement on a proposed action and its implementation. The proposal emphasizes heterogeneity, while implementation
focuses on public and fire fighter safety, management of Pacific fisher and spotted owl habitat, and restoration of forest structure and fire
- A broad range of participants helped bring needed expertise and unique problem-solving abilities. Participants were committed to thinking
differently and working together to achieve agreement.
Highlights and Innovations
- Independent science was a key to the success of the planning forum. A paper published by the Pacific Southwest Research Station encouraged
new discussions about ecosystem management. The lead author participated in the meetings and his credibility and independence helped guide the
debate on issues related to heterogeneity.
- Scientific experts were approved by the planning forum and participated in meetings, and thus were available throughout the process to
assist the negotiations. Site visits with experts also helped achieve the success of the planning forum.
- Many participants, e.g., representatives from environmental groups, brought strong technical competence and thus were able to review the
science information provided by the Forest Service.
- Facilitation by a third-party neutral helped create trust, normalize the conflict, and develop an environment conducive to problem-solving.
Partner from National Roster of ECR Practitioners
Gina Bartlett, Center for Collaborative Policy, California State University, Sacramento
U.S. Institute Project Manager
Get a PDF Version
Larry Fisher, Ph.D., Coordinator
Public Lands and Natural Resources Program
Phone: (520) 901-8544; FAX: (520) 670-5530
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org; Website: www.ecr.gov